Posts Tagged ‘climate’

Global Warming Is Not Causing Any Polar Ice Cap Meltdown Says NASA

September 18, 2015


Dramatic pictures showing ice cap melt are only depicting what happens every summer as the temperature rises.

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.

The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice extent.

Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as “proof” of a global warming crisis.)

Read full article …

In our efforts to expose the global warming sacre as a scientific scam aimed at justifying masive taxes on energy, we have returned again and to the theme of how all data supplied as evidence of catatsrophic global warming was in fact the output form mathematical models running on computers and fed ‘adjusted’ (i.e. fraudulent) data. Again and again we and many other alternative news sites have produced evidence to back our arguments, only to be met with a hysterical backlash from science zealots accusing us of heresy. Well sorry guys, science is not a religion and if you keep lying to try to prove your God infallible, those inconvenient real world facts are going to trip you up again and again.

RELATED POSTS:


Climate Change: Physicist Asks Is a Deadly Ice Age on the Horizon?

The last ice age ended approximately 12,000 years ago, and since then we’ve been enjoying a pleasantly warm “interglacial period.” But given that an interglacial may last only 12,000 years, we’re confronted with a scary prospect: Another ice age may be nigh.

America and UK Lead the World in Climate Scepticism

Climate fraud exposed

EU climate policy is a scam

The economic realities that expose the climate change fraud
Media lies that propped up climate change scare
Challenge climate scare and you’ll be subjected to a witch hunt
The real agenda behind the climate scam

Climate change index

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]…[Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ]

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions

August 29, 2015

Time to bring a recent post of ours to this dying blog platform, mainly because The Independent ran a story today about climate scientists (remember that discredited bunch of crooks and liars) claiming that climate change / global warming is steaming ahead much faster that even their most doom laden, mathematically modelled predictions have ever suggested.

Well climate scientists have never knowingly told the truth about anything. So here’s a link to a site that tells it like it is, without adjusting the data or placing the data gathering equipment in pizza ovens.

from The Daily Stirrer:
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

More >>>
It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions

Majority of Climate Scientists Don’t Agree with ‘Consensus’ – Dutch Scientific Study

August 1, 2015
Interesting to note that the ‘97% consensus’ figure was arrived at by assuming all the reports that did not state specifically that climate change is NOT caused by Carbon Dioxide were assumed to agree that it is.

We have been told ad nauseum by the Warmageddonist lobby that 97% of ‘climate scientists’ agree with the United Nations position that runaway global warming (which is responsible for the overnight frosts we are getting in July here in norther England) is cause by Carbon Dioxide emissions from human activity.

The 97% consensus was of course a fictional device dreamed up by the owners of the dishonestly named Skeptical Science website and has been demolished many times by simple examination of the facts.

You can always spot science frauds and wankers of course, they spell skeptic with a k because they think it is more scientific (Helpful info: skepticos (Greek) – one who doubts; scepticus (late Latin) – one who questions official dogma.

The Skeptical Science wankers are wrong on all counts, there is no conceivable meaning or inflection of either that could be interpreted as meaning ‘one who professes an absolute belief in globalist propaganda and denies all evidence presented to challenge that propaganda.

Thus we expect Skeptical Science will soon be orchestrating hate mob attacks (similar to those used by the Spanish Inquisition in their campaign to root out heresy) in order to discredit the Dutch researchers who have carried out a survey of over 6000 climate scientists and found that over half disagree with the alleged consensus and the 43% who agree with the IPCC do not go so far as to blame carbon dioxide specifically but limit themselves to saying such warming as was seen between 1950 and 1996 was caused by ‘human activity’ (which could include but is not limited to prodigious shagging leading to a population explosion in third world countries, deforestation, geoengineering projects and intensive farming methods involving feeding cows farty food.

The study, by the PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (pdf – read online or download), a government body, invited 6550 scientists working in climate related fields, including climate physics, climate impact, and mitigation, to take part in a survey on their views of climate science.

Here’s more on that research project

Ignore Scarmongering IPCC, science confirms CO2 cools the earth

March 31, 2014

The big news today is the scaremongering report issued by scientists working for the Rothschild Fear and Panic To Justify Theft Of Punters Money foundation also known as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. Despite containing statements that the impacts of climate change are not likely to be as severe as predicted and the predictions of mathematical models used exclusively by the Rothschild climate scientists have so far differed wildly on the alarmist side from observed reality, the fearmongering must go on to persuade people around the world to accept global totalitarian government by Rothschild appointed technocrats.

Science was ever fascism’s whore.

Do not forget however that one of the designated joint authors of the report refused to be associated with it because of the fearmongering, exaggerations, deceptions and lies it contains.

UK professor refuses to put his name to ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey .

Little Nicky Machiavelli @ 2014-03-26

A UK academic has refused to put his name to the ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey that he claims is exaggerating the effects of climate change.

A climate scientist has accused the United Nations of being too alarmist over global warming – and demanded his name be removed from a crucial new report.

Professor Richard Tol, an economist at the University of Sussex, said fellow UN academics were exaggerating climate change and comparing it to the ‘apocalypse’.

His comments are a blow to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which on Monday will publish its first update in seven years on the impacts of climate change.

Previous IPCC reports on climate impact have been plagued by errors that damaged the body’s credibility

Continue reading:

And now to add to the woes of the Rothschild scientists, the Rothschild influenced Supranational bureaucracies, the Rothschild owned central banks and the Rothschild lackeys in governments of the world’s great nations, there are still some independent researchers out there doing real research on things that relate to the real world, rather that using the system known as the Rothschild Scientific Method which involves starting from an answer and working backwards to build a case to support it. People like these guys:

Science Confirmed: Carbon Dioxide & Water Vapour Cool Earth’s Atmosphere

Mexican study affirms a 1951 finding by top American scientists that
carbon dioxide (CO2) cannot cause global warming. Applying known scientific values, more eminent scientists are coming forward to confirm
that atmospheric CO2 mixes with clouds and water vapour to cause only
cooling. As such, the credibility of “consensus science” claims about
man-made global warming being caused by rises in CO2 levels are left in
serious doubt.

Professor Nasif Nahle (Monterrey, Mexico) provides a peer-reviewed paper,
‘Determining the Total Emissivity of a Mixture of Gases Containing Overlapping Absorption Bands,’
that uses known and well-established values from the results of experiments performed previously by H. C. Hottel, B. Leckner, M. Lapp,
C. B. Ludwig, A. F. Sarofim, et al, showing that the combined
effect of overlapping absorption bands of water vapour with CO2 causes a
reduction on the total absorptivity of the mixture of those gases in
earth’s atmosphere. As such, water vapour and CO2 are proven to combine
to cause global cooling, not warming.

Nahle’s paper affirms the long-forgotten findings of the eminent former head of Britain’s Met Office, CEP Brooks, and the American Meteorological Society (AMS) that also revealed that CO2 in the atmosphere could not cause warming. Brooks, Britain’s top climatologist at the time, along with America’s best meteorologists agreed that the idea that CO2 could warm the climate:

“was never widely accepted and was abandoned when it was found that all the long-wave radiation [that would be] absorbed by CO2 is [already] absorbed by water vapour.”
[see:“Geological and Historical Aspects of Climatic Change.” In Compendium of Meteorology, edited by Thomas F. Malone, pp. 1004-18 (at 1016). Boston: American Meteorological Association]

Scientists at Principia Scientific International(PSI), who peer-reviewed Nahle’s paper, are currently advising colleagues that the most reliable data available now confirms that CO2 is shown to act as a coolant in earth’s climate. As such, the notion of a so-called ‘greenhouse gas’ warming effect may be regarded as refuted, while environmental measures by governments and individuals to reduce “carbon emissions” to combat climate change are, in turn, rendered pointless.

For those interested in reading Professor Nahle’s full paper (revised April
2011), we publish it below:

Abstract
According to anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
theory, carbon dioxide increases the potential of water vapour to absorb and emit IR radiation as a consequence of the overlapping
absorption/emission spectral bands. I have determined the total emissivity of a mixture of gases containing 5% of water vapour and 0.039% of carbon dioxide in all spectral bands where their absorptivities/emissivities overlap. The result of my calculations is that carbon dioxide reduces the total absorptivity/emissivity of the water vapour, working like a coolant, not a warmer of the atmosphere and the surface …

Continue reading at Principia Scientific International

So you see, what the IPCC are trying to scare you with is not Climate Science, it’s Rothschild magic money science(i.e. we need those carbon taxes so the monster can grow because it it does not grow it dies, so the science is settled, naa naa na naa naa.)

Don’t you think its suspicious that as the desperation to get those carbon taxes implemented so governments can pay the interest on the obscene sums they have to borrow every month to make ends meet, just as governments create the illusion of economic recovery by using rigged markets to inflate another housing bubble and using that to drive a consumption led boom just ahead of the next planned crash is all a bit suspicious.

Greenteeth climate change menu

If you Think Global Warming Is Bollocks you’re One Of The 98%

March 2, 2014

Mike Haseler’s survey of sceptic opinion.

from Bishop Hill

The Scottish Climate & Energy Forum has been conducting a survey on the background and attitudes of participants to online climate discussions. Thanks to the generosity of all who participated, the survey has had a massive response which will take time and resource to process. However initial analysis already shows that the actual views and backgrounds of participants are in sharp contrast with some high-profile statements being made about the participants. [ … ]

A sceptical consensus: the science is right but catastrophic global warming is not going to happen

A recent survey of those participating in on-line forums showed that most of the 5,000 respondents were experienced engineers, scientists and IT professionals most degree qualified and around a third with post graduate qualifications. The survey, carried out by the Scottish Climate and Energy Forum, asked respondents for their views on CO2 and the effect it might have on global temperatures. The results were surprising. 96% of respondents said that atmospheric CO2 levels are increasing with 79% attributing the increase to man-made sources.

So what’s going on?

Above all, these highly qualified people – experts in their own spheres – look at the published data and trust their own analysis, so their views match the available data. [ … ]

Beyond this, the survey found that 98% of respondents believe that the climate varies naturally and that increasing CO2 levels won’t cause catastrophic warming.

Mike Haseler

Read more at Bishop Hill blog

So my fellow sceptics, isn’t it great to know we are part of the 98% consensus. That’s 98% of everyone, not 97% of 30% of 12% which is the scientific methodology behind those silly “the science is settled” claims.

Winter Deaths: Annual Fear And Panic campaign begins

November 26, 2013

Official government scaremongers and Big Pharma vaccine pushers yesterday began the annual campaign to convince us all that if we stop thinking and do what the government and the medical whores working in Big Pharma tell us we will be immortal. The opening shot of the campaign was the release of official figures revealing ‘winter deaths’ rose 29 per cent to 31,000 last year – the highest level since 2009.

The Office for National Statistics said cold weather (Global Warming shills NB, last year was the coldest since 1962)and the flu were responsible for most of these and said the majority of the winter deaths over the 2012-2013 winter involved over 75 year-olds.

So pretty soon I will be getting my annual bombardment of letters and phone calls reminding me I am due for my annual ‘refresher’ flu jab.

Refresher my arse. I’ve never had a flu jab. I have never had flu and that’s how I want it to stay so why would I let Big Pharma squirt flu bugs into me?

For global warming freaks again, if you want to see a genuine hockey stick graph, just take a look at how the death rate from all causes shoots up once people pass age 75.

Britain’s biggest pensioner organisation, the National Pensioners Convention, described the figures as a “national scandal”. Dot Gibson, NPC national secretary said: “Making sure older people have got a well insulated warm home and the income to pay the fuel bills isn’t green crap. It’s what a decent society should do.

Hmm, yes, but my Dear Old Mum and all her friends seem to manage quite nicely and not all of them have three kids who say, “Never mind the expense Mum, if you are cold turn up the heating and send me the bill.”

“How can colder Scandinavian countries avoid this annual toll while we simply wring our hands? The Government needs to roll out a more effective programme to insulate homes, build more sustainable properties for older people, raise the winter fuel allowance and tackle the excessive profits of the big six energy companies.”

Ed Matthew, of the Energy Bill Revolution, said the Government should be “ashamed” and stepped up calls for Ministers to use the billions of pounds of tax collected from household energy bills each year to insulate homes of vulnerable people.

And in that final comment above we see, in all its glory, the cuntiness of do gooders who work in the charity sector. The government is responsible for individuals, the government must find unlimited funds to support this amorphous group, ‘vulnerable people’.

The thing is old people sometimes have strange obsessions, like they feel they have to subsidise their alcoholic kids or feed and care for ninety seven cats or dogs. They have enough money to care for themselves but choose to spend it in other ways.

What should we do?

If old people were given human sized hamster wheels to run round they would not die from hypothermia and could generate electricity to light the lights and boil the kettle (to make cup – a – soups) to keep them warm. Simples.

Apart from that, after two decades of being brainwashed daily with the global warming propaganda crap pumped out by the Climate Science Cunts Club, people have come to believe that we are living in an era of sub tropical temperatures as far north as the Arctic Circle (repeat the lie often enough etc.) and have forgotten how to react to cold weather.

If your house is not well insulated (and can there me any house in Britain that is not on the verge of collapse under the weight of extra insulation installed as a result of government initiatives over the past twenty years,) we need to remember as we enter an era of global cooling to dress appropriately for winter conditions. There are parts of England where people have forgotten what an overcoat is, and I’m not talking about Newcastle where people are so hard they just don’t care. Look at news coverage from a commuter station in the south east in winter, you will not see one person wearing a heavy coat, with scarf and gloves.

Lay the blame totally on the pointless Green Crap agenda supported by the LibLabCon trick, a massive exercise in shovelling money into the pockets of their greedy corporate donors.

Tax revenue that could have gone to dealing with the real problems of real people has been pissed into wind by these idiots and the corporate whores we are obliged to call climate scientists. Research grants and subsidies have been doled out to con artists in “The Green Economy” and used to create ‘green jobs’ for tax avoidance specialists in the financial sector.

Now after a mutual masturbation session in Warsaw, we learn we are to flush a further £1,500,000,000 down the green toilet on top of the existing £3,000,000,000 in “Climate Aid”, we already get stung for. ALL of this money is spent on jollies for politicians, bureaucrats and ‘scientists’. Just think how much good four and a half billion could do at home, providing care for the needy and infirm, alleviating the need for benefit cuts, helping councils keep business rates down so local shops could survive, and building the kind of sheltered accommodation older people need when eventually they cannot care for themselves properly.

Vote for anyone except the LibLabCon Corporate Alliance. They work for the bastards who want to steal your money.

The elite just do not care about ordinary people!

RELATED POSTS:
Dr. Offit, Vaccine Pusher in Chief is exposed as a liar.
Are Hospitals A Good Place To Die? NHS mismanagement raises embarrassing questions

Clegg Claims Right To Deny Others Free Speech

November 7, 2013

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg claims he is entitled to call Tory climate science sceptics “deniers” despite a warning by the government’s chief scientist that it is an “abusive” term.

The Deputy Prime Minister said that while he accepts the advice of Sir Mark Walport, he does not agree with his choice of “verbs, adjectives and nouns”.

The use of the term climate deniers has become increasingly controversial after John Howard, the former Australian Prime Minister, said that the term was used with “malice aforethought” by those who want to silence sceptics.

On Wednesday, Sir Mark told MPs that he was uncomfortable with the term. He said: “As far as possible it is always best to avoid abuse.

A spokesman for the Conservatives said they don’t care what Nick Clegg calls them so long as he does not complain when they call him an ineffectual, woolly brained, hand wringing, limp wristed TWAT.

Landmark climate change report leaked online

December 14, 2012

Landmark climate change report leaked online

Draft of IPCC’s fifth assessment, due to be published in September 2013, leaked online by climate sceptic Alex Rawls. It’s a safe bet that the content differs widely from what will eventually be published by mainstream media.

Thhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/dec/14/ipcc-climate-change-report-leaked-onlinee draft of a major global warming report by the UN’s climate science panel has been leaked online.

The fifth assessment report (AR5) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which is not due to be published in full until September 2013, was uploaded onto a website called Stop Green Suicide on Thursday and has since been mirrored elsewhere on the internet.

The IPCC, which confirmed the draft is genuine, said in a statement: “The IPCC regrets this unauthorized posting which interferes with the process of assessment and review. We will continue not to comment on the contents of draft reports, as they are works in progress.”

A little-known US-based climate sceptic called Alex Rawls, who had been accepted by the IPCC to be one of the report’s 800 expert reviewers, admitted to leaking the document. In a statement posted online, he sought to justify the leak: “The addition of one single sentence [discussing the influence of cosmic rays on the earth’s climate] demands the release of the whole. That sentence is an astounding bit of honesty, a killing admission that completely undercuts the main premise and the main conclusion of the full report, revealing the fundamental dishonesty of the whole.”

Climate sceptics have heralded the sentence – which they interpret as meaning that cosmic rays could have a greater warming influence on the planet than mankind’s emissions – as “game-changing”.

The isolation by climate sceptics of one sentence in the 14-chapter draft report was described as “completely ridiculous” by one of the report’s lead authors. Prof Steve Sherwood, a director of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales, told ABC Radio in Australia: “You could go and read those paragraphs yourself and the summary of it and see that we conclude exactly the opposite, that this cosmic ray effect that the paragraph is discussing appears to be negligible … It’s a pretty severe case of [cherry-picking], because even the sentence doesn’t say what [climate sceptics] say and certainly if you look at the context, we’re really saying the opposite.”

The leaked draft “summary for policymakers” contains a statement that appears to contradict the climate sceptics’ interpretation.

It says: “There is consistent evidence from observations of a net energy uptake of the earth system due to an imbalance in the energy budget. It is virtually certain that this is caused by human activities, primarily by the increase in CO2 concentrations. There is very high confidence that natural forcing contributes only a small fraction to this imbalance.”

By “virtually certain”, the scientists say they mean they are now 99% sure that man’s emissions are responsible. By comparison, in the IPCC’s last report, published in 2007, the scientists said they had a “very high confidence” – 90% sure – humans were principally responsible for causing the planet to warm.

Richard Betts, a climate scientist at the Met Office Hadley Centre and an AR5 lead author, tweeted that the report is still a draft and could well change: “Worth pointing out that the wording in the leaked IPCC WG1 [working group 1, which examines the “physical science basis” of climate change] draft chapters may still change in the final versions, following review comments.”

Bob Ward, policy and communications director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at London School of Economics and Political Science, said that Rawls appeared to have broken the confidentiality agreement signed by reviewers: “As a registered reviewer of the IPCC report, I condemn the decision by a climate change sceptic to violate the confidentiality of the review process. The review of the IPCC report is being carried out in line with the principles of peer review which operate throughout academic science, including an expectation of high standards of ethical behaviour by reviewers. It is disappointing, if not surprising, that climate change sceptics have been unable to meet these high standards of ethical behaviour.”

The IPCC, which publishes a detailed synthesis of the latest climate science every seven years to help guide policy makers, has experienced leaks before. In 2000, the third assessment report was leaked to the New York Times, while the fourth assessment report was published in 2006 by the US government a year ahead of its official publication.

Prof Bill McGuire, Professor of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London and contributing author on the recent IPCC report on climate change and extreme events, said that sceptics’ reading of the draft was incorrect: “Alex Rawls’ interpretation of what IPCC5 says is quite simply wrong. In fact, while temperatures have been ramping up in recent decades, solar activity has been pretty subdued, so any interaction with cosmic rays is clearly having minimal – if any – effects. IPCC AR5 reiterates what we can be absolutely certain of: that contemporary climate change is not a natural process, but the consequence of human activities.”

Prof Piers Forster, Professor of Climate Change at the University of Leeds, said: “Although this may seem like a ‘leak’, the draft IPCC reports are not kept secret and the review process is open. The rationale in not disseminating the findings until the final version is complete, is to try and iron out all the errors and inconsistencies which might be inadvertently included. Personally, I would be happy if the whole IPCC process were even more open and public, and I think we as scientists need to explore how we can best match the development of measured critical arguments with those of the Twitter generation.”

What we may note from the above is how dishonest those who ride the climate change gravy train are prepared to be in defence of the fake science that gives them luxurious lifestyles. Firstly the accusation that Rawls has misinterpreted the report. This really is just the old argument from authority trick, saying in effect, “He’s not a scientists so he cant understand the science. Really however the language is fairly straightforward, it says what it says and there is only so much room for interpretation.

Then there is the claim that ‘temperatures have been ramping up l.ately’. This is a blatant lie, while the ‘adjusted data’ shows eash succeeding year is the ‘hottest on record’ (although even that depends on whose records you look at) raw data shows 1998 was the hottest in the modern era and surface temperatures have not warmed significantly since.

It is possible to go on and on providing hundreds of items of evidence that show climate change (which is a constant and natural process) is not being caused by human activity, but there’s no point. The believers will go on praying to their science God for some Sodom and Gomorrah style even to punish the faithless, the sane will go on living their lives safe in the knowledge that no global catastrophes are imminent and the ruling elites will go on exploiting scaremongering propaganada to justify punitive taxes on energy and other essentials.

 

Warmageddonists cannot accept global warming was a tax raising scam

December 7, 2012

I recently looked at a post by a man who claims to be a “scientist” and to pursue the truth through the “scientific method.” Let’s call him Mr. Chuckles the Evil Clown because in his warped universe the “scientific truth” is whatever he wants it to be and evidence in support of that truth is whatever he tells you it is. And you and I are not allowed to question Mr. Chuckles because he’s a scientist and therefore infallible, ineffable and an all round better person than us because he’s a scientist (but we only have his word for any of those things). Here’s a link to his post:

Climate Change — Global Warming: By Any Name Trouble’s Coming Like a Train

Climate Change and Global Warming are two terms used interchangeably in common conversation. In truth, Global Warming is but a subset of Climate Change, but at the moment the most threatening subset. Three recent reports highlight the reality of the threat.

In a report scheduled for release on Tuesday December 4th at the Doha, Qatar, international climate talks, scientists will warn that the melting permafrost in the Arctic is releasing huge quantities of methane, the most potent of greenhouse gasses. As the permafrost melts, buried forests and marshes begin to decompose, releasing the first scouts of tens of billions of tons of greenhouse gasses now trapped in those wet and rotting forests. Those billions of tons of gasses simply dwarf the millions of tons available for industries and governments to manage. One scientist involved in the study has said that a “tipping point,” a point at which the released gasses will create enough continuous warming to create a feedback system and preclude shutting down the cycle, may have already been reached.

The simple fact, which I’ve posted several times now, that 15 of the hottest years on record are within the last 16 years completely debunks your entire claim that there has been no warming in that period of time. The evidence is exactly contrary to your position on the matter … [truncated ]

It was not Mr. Chuckles’ post that I took exception to, the information about methane realted imminent disaster he is trying to use to spread fear and panic has been around for twenty years and nothing bad has happened yet. The person I want to hold up to ridicule is Mr. Rory M whom you will find in the comment thread. Here is his comment in reply to reasoned argument backed up by scientific evidence from a global warming sceptic:

Rory M. Dec 5, 2012, 8:18am EST
The simple fact, which I’ve posted several times now, that 15 of the hottest years on record are within the last 16 years completely debunks your entire claim that there has been no warming in that period of time. The evidence is exactly contrary to your position on the matter.

Now Rory is either stupid or a liar … or a stupid liar. Independent evidence i.e. that not compiled by pseudo scientists whose “scientific mathodolgy” is all about keeping their piggy little snouts in the trough of taxpayers money shows the data points to a very different conclusion.

THE 25 WARMEST YEARS ON RECORD (US Historical Climatology Network
reproduced on About .com/education/weather/hottest-years

On page 2 of the report is a handy chart (have to scroll down a bit for it, sorry warmageddonists – I know you hate having to do any work to check facts)

It shows that actually of the twenty five hottest years since 1895 only 5 have been in the last 16 years.

So much for the “scientific methodolgy”, the dedication of “sciencetits” to the pursuit of “scientific” truth and the all round cuntiness of the people still spreading fear and panic about man made global warming. We’ve seen through their con, discredited their arguments and exposed their science as fraudulent.

How The United Nations Disappeared 50 Million Climate Refugees

June 22, 2012

Whatever happened to all those millions of refugees who were going to be heading our way when they were made homeless by the effects of climate change? you might well ask. You probably wouldn’t because like me you had forgotten about them. Some diligent people have not and so the question has been raised. And the Unied Nations lies, deceptions and Orwellian rewriting of the past machine has gone into overdrive.

One of the people on the UN’s case is Anthony Watts, Meteorologist and Climate Blogger who has an interesting article in The Daily Caller. Here’s a teaser:

Oh boy, government idiocy at its finest. Not only is the original claim bogus, the attempts to disappear it are hilariously inept. Apparently, they’ve never heard of Google Cache at the UN. Rather than simply saying “we were wrong,” they’ve now brought even more distrust onto the UN.

Back on April 11th, Gavin Atkins of Asian Correspondent asked this simple question: What happened to the climate refugees?

It is a valid question, and he backs it up with census numbers. Here’s the first part of his story.

In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme predicted that climate change would create 50 million climate refugees by 2010. These people, it was said, would flee a range of disasters including sea level rise, increases in the numbers and severity of hurricanes, and disruption to food production.

The UNEP even provided a handy map. The map shows us the places most at risk including the very sensitive low lying islands of the Pacific and Caribbean.

It so happens that just a few of these islands and other places most at risk have since had censuses, so it should be possible for us now to get some idea of the devastating impact climate change is having on their population. Let’s have a look at the evidence:

Read the full article on the Missing 50 Million Climate Refugees: