Posts Tagged ‘homosexual’

Gay Marriage Advocates Have ‘Really Ugly, Intolerant’ Streak, Says Liberal Journalist

August 19, 2015

This blog was indifferent to gay marriage as we were to most ‘Gay Rights Issues’, until while defending (as a good liberal should) the right of opponents of same sex marriage to post their opinions in public forums.

“You can’t claim people have a right to hold such bigoted opinions, you homophobic, religious right, tea party nut job, you are denying people the right to love who they choose,” came the first screaming reply, followed by an orchestrated hate attack from they lefty mob.

Now it so happens that while I find ‘gays’ shallow, self – obsessed, self – pitying, immature and B-O-R-I-N-G, I’ve always had a lot of time for a certain kind of queers (aesthetic, articulate, witty, great company, like my friends James P and Craig D, or the best boss I ever had, Peter H (who later became a friend), and the most loyal friends anyone could wish for.

The claim that by opposing same sex marriage I am denying people the right to love whom they choose is ridiculous and ignorant. Marriage is not about love, marriage in the Abrahamic religions and most other human cultures is a system of trading daughters or sisters for money, status, land, favours, influence.

If you want a taste of what the world of ‘queers’ was like, you could read The Naked Civil Servant by Quentin Crisp, an excellent memoir by an overtly homosexual man about his life in London from the 1930s to 60s.,during which time homosexuality was criminalised.

Crisp’s wit and charm did a lot to make homosexuality acceptable in British society (Unfortunately when he had retired to live quietly as a ‘people watcher’ in New York the nasty, mean spirited, intolerant leaders of the NYC gay community turned on him when as an old man, no longer sexually active, he insisted on having his own opinion on the HIV / AIDS issue)

It is good to find that more and more people who are real liberals and understand hat being liberal means are starting to make a stand against the neo Nazis of the left and the gay rights lobby who are determined to usurp our right to free speech and to determine for ourselves what opinions we hold and where we are free to express them. I introduce liberal journalist Brendan O’Neill, who identifies as a liberal, and who has a long history on the Left of British politics, found himself in Australia to debate the issue which is currently one of the country’s hot potatoes.

But instead of the usual, glowing praise from the liberal Left, in the embedded video, O’Neill offers something a bit more interesting: intellectual honesty. Below the embed window is a summary of what Brendan says, just in case the video does not work or sound quality on your device is poor.

Brendan O’Neill: “Here’s what freaks me out about gay marriage. It presents itself as this kind of liberal, civil rightsy issue but it has this really ugly, intolerant streak to it. Any one who opposes gay marriage is demonised, harassed… we’ve seen people thrown out of their jobs because they criticise gay marriage. We’ve seen people ejected from polite society.

“Two hundred years ago if you didn’t believe in God, you wouldn’t have a hope in hell of getting ahead in public life. Today if you don’t believe in gay marriage, you don’t have a hope in hell of getting ahead in public life. There’s a real ugly element to this.

“You really see it with the whole cake shop phenomenon. This whole thing around the Western world where people are going to Christian, traditional cake shops and saying to them ‘Hey you stupid Christians, make this cake for me’ – and if they don’t they call the police, there are equality cases, shops have closed down. It’s like a 21st century form of religious persecution. It’s horrendous.”

“Of course some people support gay marriage and that’s absolutely fine, but what is extraordinary and unacceptable is that they cannot tolerate the existence of people who do not support gay marriage. And I think we sometimes fail to understand how extraordinary that is.”

Strictly Come Cruising

July 11, 2014

With its glitz, glamour and flamboyant routines, the world of ballroom dancing may seem an unlikely battleground for same-sex politics.

The Screaming Queens lobby have turned the volume up to eleven for today’s “We’re being denied the privileged status we demand,” scream, which relates to same sex couples and ballroom dancing

The feather boas are flying over a proposal that same-sex dancing partners should be banned from competitive ballroom dancing circuit.
Funny don’t you think how it’s the gay rights brigade who’ve decided to kick up a fuss although the ban would apply only to same sex dancing partners who may of course both be heterosexual. Are we dealing with professional victims here rather than professional dancers?

Members of the British Dance Council (BDC) are considering changing the rules to define a partnership as “one man and one lady” (lady, how quaintly old fashioned – but that’s ballroom for you), for all amateur and professional competitions, unless specifically stated otherwise.

Critics claim that the change in rules would mean same-sex couples may be “banned” from competing in all but a handful of specially designated competitions, despite facing no impediment to their participation until now.

Same-sex couples — both men and women — currently compete regularly across Britain, and have appeared on international versions of television snoozothon Strictly Come Dancing. Complaints have been raised arguing that, in the case of men, they have an advantage, due to their superior strength.

Peter Tatchell, simpering doyen of the gay rights lobby, said the ban would “probably be illegal” and Heather Devine, a dancer who, with her female partners, competes in competition wrote an open letter to the president of the BDC urging the proposal be rejected as it is unfair.

Is there going to be a similar outcry I wonder when the screaming queen lobby realise that the Lawn Tennis Association insists that “Mixed Doubles” matches may not include same sex teams?

But as usual (and unlike the neo Nazo gay lobby) Boggart Blog doesn’t demand that you agree with us, make up your own minds. Here’s a video of a female couple dancing that very sexy Latin American dance The Rhumba on the Israeli version of Strictly. Now I don’t mind watching a bit of girl on girl action but I think you’ll agree this is a tad too close to soft porn for primetime TV. And just think how creepy two blokes carrying on like this would look.

A Night At The Oprah

November 14, 2013

I know the name Piers Morgan is enough to make some of you throw a hissy fit. Can’t think why because he’s a Labour supporter and it’s the lefties who hate him. Oh well logic was never their strong point.

I like the guy. Especially when he twitters tweets like this:

@piersmorgan 20h

Considerably more Americans signed a petition to have me deported, than enrolled for Obamacare. I’d start panicking if I were you, Mr President …

Don’t think Obama will be worried though, he’ll blame the Republicans, after all those stupid, stick in the mud bastards insisted on seeing what was in the Affordable Care Act before they would vote on it which forced the Prez dude to write a few clauses underneath the first one which said, “The President was elected, he can do what he likes”.

Hey, you know how I like to tell you I am never wrong. Well sometimes I lie. How could I have been so wrong about Oprah Winfrey. I always thought she was an intelligent and articulate woman. but today I heard her on TV saying the only reason people despise Obama is because of the colour of his skin.

The dumb tart doesn’t get it does she.

In Britain we have Cameron, very roughly 33% of people despise him, 33% of people think he’s OK, 33% of people don’t give a damn.

Before him we had Brown, very roughly 33% of people despised him, 33% of people thought he was OK, 33% of people don’t give a damn.

Before him we had Blair, very roughly 33% of people despised him, 3% of people thought he was OK and 666% believed he was the devil incarnate.

Before him we had Major, very roughly 33% of people liked, disliked or were indifferent to him, 66% said John Who?

Before him we had Maggie, 50% of people adored her, 666% hated and loathed her and and 150% needed post traumatic stress therapy after every time her name was mentioned. It was in Maggie’s era that creative accounting became the norm.

Before Maggie we had Jim Callaghan, everybody liked him but everybody thought he was useless.

See the pattern there Oprah, you horrible racist, you. 5 Prime Ministers, none of them black, all widely despised. Why do you think that is, what have they in common?

They’re politicians.

It is our solemn duty to hate politicians because they are arrogant, lying, cheating, hypocritical, incompetent, self interested shits, why should black ones get special treatment especially a politician like Obama who possesses all those quantities in abundance. You people wanted equality, now fucking live with it and stop whining.

People hate Obama because he’s a politician. Did anyone give george W Bush a ride because he was white? Or Bill Cinton (OK apart from Monica Lewinsky)or Jimmy Carter? And they shot Ronald Reagan and worse, named a burger Chain mascot after him.

See Oprah Winfrey say anyone who criticises the murderer and war criminal Barack Hussein Obama is racist

Hear more about Obama’s early career as a rent boy and homosexual crack ho.

We have to admit it is just getting to difficult to write a satirical blog. Rumours circulating about Obama and his corrupt administration are far to crazy for us to write crazy stuff about them.