Posts Tagged ‘law’

What A Wonderful Result

July 14, 2014

Forget the World Cup (well done Germany though) the big result of the weekend is another great win for the conspiracy theorists as former appeal Court Jude and Cover – Up artist par excellence Baroness Butler – Sloss is forced by a torrent of public outrage to step down as chair of the official whitewashing of inquiry into sexual high crimes and misdemeanours among the elite.

With allegations that have been simmering since the 1980s now coming to the boil, and Butler – Sloss having been involved in a previous cover up while her brother, former Attoney General to Margaret Thatcher’s government Sir Michael Havers having been accused of cronyism for his failure to prosecute diplomat and known paedophile, the late Sir Peter Ancram andgoing way beyond his job description in his efforts to prevent Tory MP Geoffery (honourable-but-dim) Dickens using Parliamentary privilege to name Ancram, surely David Cameron’s decision to appoint Butler – Sloss for her expertise in covering up investigating allegations of sexual abuse committed by members of the elite must be an indication of complicity in the cover up rather than pure and simple incompetence.

Whichever way you look at it, the way all this has at last expoled in the establishments face (and driven another million or so votes to UKIP) is a great result for those of us who have been talking about corruption at all levels of the establishment for thirty years now (I was doing jokes about Havers and Ancram, Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall, Leon Brittan and hush puppies (any a numberr of Labour figures) in the early 1980s (and getting pulled offstage for going too far over the line on one occasion).

But forget the establishment and their cover ups, let’s do a bit of examining the evidence of our own:

Butler-Sloss ‘kept allegations of bishop’s abuse quiet because she she ‘cared about the Church

Why Do The Left Love Paedophiles

Judge Butler – Sloss Best To Head Elitist Paedophile Cover Up Inquiry – Cameron

No Conspiracy Of Silence On Elitist Paedophiles

Organising a Cover Up to Cover Up a Cover up? Just call The Establishment

Conspiracy: What Has Induced The BBC paranoia about paedophiles

RELATED POSTS:
What Happened To Battling Barbara’s VIP Paedophile Dossier
The Greenteeth menu of conspiracies

Max Was The Absolute Mini

March 19, 2014

max clifford
Max Clifford trial- getting to the nub of the matter

We are always mindful of the original purpose og Boggart Blog which was to ridicule the high and mighty. These days of course they ridicule themselves and we are more involved in reporting the news youl will not read in the papers or hear on television or radio.

Every so often however a story comes along which evokes laughter even in the most serious minded bloggers. Such a story is the trial of PR guru (Not so) Max Clifford. here’s an extract from the court report:

“…the woman (an aspiring fashion model,) one of seven alleged victims of sexual assaults by the publicist, was advised to go and see him (Clifford) in 1983, when she was about 17.

She described how Mr Clifford allegedly locked the door, groped her and tried to make her perform oral sex on him.

The court has previously heard claims that his penis is “tiny” and no more than two-and-a-half inches when erect.

The woman that at the time she thought Mr Clifford was well-endowed and his penis was very large.

“I had only seen one before, I had never seen one in that proximity and that situation,” she said.

Richard Horwell QC, defending, asked her about the issue, the woman remarked: “I have a small mouth. I do, my dentist has always said…”

This prompted laughter from the jury, which was sent out for a few minutes.

When Jurors returned they were told by judge Anthony Leonard QC: “It is inevitable in a case dealing with this sort of graphic detail that members of the jury want to burst out laughing.

“I can remember a very boring court case and we – I wasn’t a judge then – became helpless with laughter and the judge had tears in his eyes and it took over 25 minutes to recover.

“But we have got to remember that this is a court of law and we are dealing with serious allegations, and, in fairness to the witness, and the rest of the court, you have got to learn not to react to what’s happening. Can I ask you to settle down and remember where you are?”

Remember where you are? how could they forget when looking across a courtroom at “Nubber” Clifford. He can keep his millions, I’ve got something that throughout my life has brought me much more joy.

Ewwwwww … What Kind Of Dick Would have Sex With A Hornets Nest

March 12, 2014

Somebody dug up this old story from Ann Brewslaw in Cosmopolitian and I had to spread it round. (h/t to The Tap for putting it in front of my face)

Attempting To Have Intercourse With Hornet’s Nest Is Very Bad Idea

Irrefutable law of physics: If it exists, some dude has tried to have sex with it. And if it has a hole, at least one guy you know personally has totally had sex with it.

Case in point: In a weird, fatal tryst that belongs in the Darwin Awards, a 35-year-old Swedish man we’ll call “Hasse” was found dead on his farm at around noon on Monday. The dead body of this Hasse, who was known in local “tavern circles” (which sort of explains why he might have thought that sticking his knob into a den of hundreds of hornets was a good idea), was found with 146 wasp stings on his body, 54 of which were located on his genitals and scrotum, according to KPC Radio’s Walton and Johnson blog.

Picture this: You’re a hornet, and you’re just chilling at home. Quiet night in. Suddenly, right in the middle of that episode of M*A*S*H you were watching, a Huge Pinkish Turgid Monster crashes through the wall of your house. No wonder they were mad.

don't fuck with the hornets nest

No matter how long you stare at the pic of a hornets’ nest or how long it is since you had sex, it looks nothing like a lady’s naughty bits.

I’ve read Stieg Larssen’s novel from The Millennium Trilogy, The Girl Who Kicked A Hornets Nest, but I never though I’d read the story of The Guy Who Fucked A Hornets Nest.

Dog Wasn’t Pulling Owners Leg

November 12, 2013

November 11, 2013

Owning a dog, what with all the vets bills and such can cost an arm and a leg but 93 year old Bill Flowers was not so unfortunate, In fact Bill gained a leg thanks to his pooch Liberty.

Dogs like to bring things home to share with their owners and Liberty brought Bill a human leg. Bill was not too happy as he was afraid the gift might attract the long arm of the law.

Fearing that he might be prosecuted for legging it from a crime scene, or worse that the cops might not believe Liberty’s story (“Well I was just going about me business see, pissing on trees, chasing cats, sniffing things, and it just sort of fell into me pocket”) and accuse the dog’s owner of being a barking mad homicidal maniac, Flowers buried the leg. He told his daughter Cheryl about the dog’s strange find and after four days she managed to convince him he should tell the police because whoever had lost the leg might be hopping mad about the loss but might also be having difficulty getting out to look for their property.

Bill told police that his dog Liberty had brought home a grayish leg and stood over it wagging her tail. Flowers said the leg didn’t appear damaged, and it was severed inches from the buttocks (Liberty is a big dog – see below). Authorities located other body parts on Sunday.

Police placed a GPC device on Liberty in hopes that she would take them to the rest of the remains. Search dogs eventually located a pelvis and ribcage. Authorities have not yet identified the victim or disclosed a cause of death (although we will go out on a limb and say we suspect not many people would survive being chopped up in pieces so cause of death might be dismemberment related.)

Read more about this grisly find at the Komo News website.

leg hound
Liberty,

Nothing to hide

November 1, 2013

You have nothing to fear of you have done nothing wrong.
They’ve all said it, Blair, Brown, various Labour home secretaries as their wretched, illiberal government churned out new laws faster than the Stationery Office could purchase paper to print them all on, Cameron and Hague, Obama and Bush …

CCTV Surveillance? Only those who are up to no good need worry about it.

Electronic eavesdropping on phone and internet activity?
If you have nothing to hide what are you afraid of the government snooping on your computer?

Computer system security failures?
If you are a law abiding citizen why do you not want your personal data published online?

The shits who rule us and the whores who service them don’t seem to understand the simple principle of privacy, that if what we do is within the law its none of their fucking business.

Here’s a reminder of why we must not surrender that principle.

nothing to hide nothing to fearRELATED POSTS:
Conspiracy Theorist? BBC Thought Police Attack Free Speech
Shock, Horror! Conspiracy Theorists Are Sane Say Social Science Researchers

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeBoggart-Eft at Blogster Greenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthIan at WikinutAuthorTold By An IdiotGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribdLittle Nicky Machiavelli
Ian Thorpe at Facebook


By TwitterButtons.net

How The "Yooman Rights" Brigade Plan To Boot You Off The Internet

July 7, 2012

For years I have argued that the internet should accept some form of regulation to the extent only that everything posted ought to be identifiable to a source thus imposing the constraints of normal decency on people and curbing the criminal activity the world wide web has spawned.

You should have heard the wailing and gnashing of teeth from lefties and “yooman rights” campaigners about how this would curtail freedom. if you are familiar with how the left operates and how control freakery comes as naturally to them as sucking on a tit comes to a mammilian baby you might have found this commitment to freedom a bit suspect. After all the only freedom the left have ever been concerned with is their own freedom to Impose their ideals and values on the rest of us (by force if necessary).

It should come as no surprise then that the left’s commitment to internet freedom lasted only as long as it took them to come up with a way to get independent websites and blogs off the cybersphere and ensure that we could see ONLY officially approved propaganda. Hat tip to Anna Raccoon for bringing this to my attention.

Last month in a little noticed case in the US, a Federal Judge made a ruling that has implications for us all. We may think that the truly sensitive and the terminally offended have been making inroads into the freedom of the Internet, but they are piffling flea bites compared to the implications of this case.

What the ruling – that the Internet is ‘a place of public accommodation’ – boils down to in plain English is that the Internet has the same status as a Public House, your local council offices, Disneyland, the O2 Arena, and anywhere else you can think of that has to comply with disabled accessibility legislation. It will be your responsibility to ensure that the blind reader has a voice over of your hastily crafted howl of anger at the latest government outrage, that the deaf have suitable sub-titles on your YouTube efforts, and one can only presume, that the terminally stupid have a simplified version in words of one syllable, to ensure that everyone has an ‘enjoyable and enriching experience’ when they land on your blog.

The lawyers are sharpening their quills already, for it matters not that you are penning your anguished prose from a bed sit in Bridlington – your reader may well be a one eyed Albanian asylum seeker in the US, libel law has long since established precedent that if he can access your words in the US, then you are publishing in the US, regardless of where your ‘server’ is.

Could YouTube be obligated to close-caption videos on the site? (This case seems to leave that door open.) Could every website using Flash have to redesign their sites for browsers that read the screen? I’m not creative enough to think of all the implications, but I can assure you that ADA plaintiffs’ lawyers will have a long check list of items worth suing over. Big companies may be able to afford the compliance and litigation costs, but the entry costs for new market participants could easily reach prohibitive levels.

One common argument for imposing accessibility obligations on physical businesses is that it is unrealistic to expect the disabled to simply ‘go somewhere else’ if the nearest business can’t accommodate their needs. The Internet doesn’t have territorial limitations – by extending this ruling to the Internet, the lawyers are in effect saying that everyone must make every part of their ‘public life’ accessible to anyone who wishes, worLd wide, to partake of the opportunity.

Now I don’t expect this to affect Joe Bloggs blogging from his back room in Bridlington overnight – but it doesn’t require too much imagination to realise that if Google get sued for failing to provide a voice over on their political blogs, they will immediately refuse to host any blog that doesn’t comply. Netfix, the company which the American Association for the Deaf successfully sued for failing to provide sub-titles on the videos which they streamed, may be able to afford the costly technology to comply with this ruling, individual bloggers won’t. Netfix may respond by not hosting movies which don’t carry sub-titles, I would expect Google to take the same route.

Read the full post: Wheelchair access to the blogosphere

Now as Anna says this law willl not be enforced right away to make sure we bloggers, contributors and site owners provide access to a braille translator or a text to voice converter so that your partially sighted visitors can have access to our rants, pithy observations, homilies, philosiphizing, self indulgent rambles and scintillating prose. but once the “yooman rights” brigade find a site that challenges their prejudices and does not conform to these requirements there is not much doubt about which way a court verdict will go.

The answer of course is we can all ignore the law and work on the prinbiciple that they can’t put us all in prison. “OK, but what if they decide to put me in prison to make an example of somebody?” you might well ask.

Simples. At the first sign of trouble take your stuff offline. Back it all up and find yourself a host that operates its servers from Andorra, Costa Rica or some such place that does not have any serious libel laws. Pay with your paypal account. Use a proxy server such as Anonymouse and rebuild your website using a pseudonym to disguisE your authorship (something like Aethelred-Naggernunk is good)

Then the “yooman rights” lawyers can spend their time chasing shadows while you concentrte on building links to your site and getting your ideas out to the widest possible audience and promote the cause of free thinking against the dark forces of “progressiveism”.

UPDATE:
And it is not just the politically correct Thought Police who don’t want you on the web …
Latest Google update favours their own products and sites that pay for traffic

RELATED POSTS:
Internet Threat To CIvilisation
WHY THE INTELLECTUAL ELITE DESPISE THE LOWER CLASSES

Al Qaeda Threaten Terrorist Attacks On Britain If Hate Preacher Abu Qatada Is Deported

April 21, 2012

Militant Al Qaeda faction Al Shabaab has warned that Britain will face terror attacks if Islamic extemist and hate ptreadcing cleric Abu Qatada is deported to his homeland, Jordan.

The Al Qaeda militants warned of a “disaster” for Britain if the Government attempts to send Qatada home to face charges of sedition and inciting terrorism.

SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors online activity from terrorist groups, said al-Shabaab had issued its warning on militant forums.

“The British public is also forewarned that it will be the British government, as a result of its imprudence, that shall be liable for any disaster that befalls them, or their national interests,” the statement said.. It comes a week after Al-Qaeda threatened to attack Britain if it decides to extradite Qatada.

In a statement signed by Al-Qaeda’s general command and published on jihadist forums, the terror network said Abu Qatada’s extradition would “open the gates of evil” on “Britain and its citizens everywhere.” (Read the full story).

This is nothing much to worry about of course, it’s very likely nothing more than typical middle eastern windbaggery. With any luck a few wannabe martyrs (the lure of 72 virgins is strong) will blow themselves up trying to build bombs, life in Britain will go n unmolested and the majority of law abinding Muslims will ontinue to live peacefully, side by side with their atheist, agnostic and Christian neighbours.

RELATED POSTS:
Beards of terror
A Frenchman Dropped His Trousers
Pastor Penney
Afghan Woman
Fear And Panic And HP Sauce
Government By Fear And Panic
Fondue Of Terror
Allies Neutralise Afghan Beards Of Terror
The politics of Fear And Panic
Firuza Let Your Hair Fall Free
Diabetic And Dangerous
Allies Take Out Beards Of Terror
You Can’t Be Too Paranoid
Surveillance Society – Quis Custrodiat Custodes
Them
Institutional Pognophobia